When a Master collars a slave, is he entitled to her posessions?
Update [06/07/2002 @ 07:39]:
I think that if the Master and slave have negotiated with each other the disposition of posessions, then yes, the Master is likely entitled to whatever was agreed upon. I know that I have met couples who do this and seem happy with it. These same couples fall into two categories. The first category has something like a "prenuptial" agreement where it is laid out legally what the slave will receive if the relationship with the Master ends. The other has no such agreement.
If I were to enter into a Master/slave relationship (which is unlikely) I would insist upon the safety net of the agreement.
If the title of this blog sounds familiar, it is because it comes from the title of Viola Johnson's book, To Love, to Obey, to Serve. Her order of importance for the life of a servant speaks to me and her influence can be found in much of what I write.
Thursday, June 6, 2002
Labels:
bdsm,
negotiation,
power exchange,
questions,
relationships
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment